In every family, someone ends up with “the stuff.” It is the goal of The Family Curator to inspire, enlighten, and encourage other family curators in their efforts to preserve and share their own family treasures.

Next Edition:
Sept 2010

 

Entries in archival (3)

Tuesday
Jan262010

Organize and Preserve Original Documents Used in Your Genealogy Research

 

It doesn’t matter what kind of filing system you use for your genealogical research and sources, sooner or later most family historians need to file a primary document, or Heirloom Original. The easiest solution is to just file it with your census printouts and photocopies of birth certificates in binders or file folders, whatever you use. This is the method advocated in an online genealogy course I took last year.

I am afraid I wasn’t a very cooperative student, however, and cringed at the thought of my grandmother’s marriage certificate peeking out the top of a protective sleeve in my 3-ring binder. It seemed that a better solution would be to store this original document archivally and cross-reference it in my files.  I also had other original documents such as my own children’s baptism certificates and assorted funeral programs, I needed a system for filing all of these special documents.

In figuring out a workable system, it was helpful to consider

The Curator’s Commandments:

  1.  First, thou shall do no harm to original artifacts
  2. AND thou shall endeavor to preserve same for future generations
  3.  Thou shall retain the original order of a collection whenever reasonable and possible
  4. Thou shall only file paper that 8 ½ x 11 inches in size in binders or in file folders
  5.  Thou shall set up a filing system that is simple and sustainable

 My own filing system consists of research and sources filed by surname in 3-ring binders. Instead of filing Heirloom Originals directly in the binder, I place an 8 ½ x 11 inch copy in the binder and write on the copy a reference to where the original is stored. This satisfies Commandments #1, #4 and hopefully #5.

The original document needs to be preserved (see Commandment #2), therefore it is stored in a suitable archival container. My original documents come from different families, which I see as different collections. In order to keep those collections intact (#3), I set up separate file envelopes for each family. This mimics the order I use for my binders, keeping the arrangement as simple as possible (#5).

Arline’s collection is so large that original documents are housed in several different boxes. All other family collections take up no more than one envelope each and are placed together inside one archival box.

For example, my research lives in 3-ring binders filed by Surname with all sources in protective sleeves behind a tab for each couple. If the document is an Heirloom Original, I file a photocopy and write on the document a simple location code, the Surname or Collection and File (F) or Box (B) Number, for example, BROWN F01 or AAK B04. I don’t try to give each document a file number, although that would probably be good to do. Instead, I use an inventory sheet in the file itself to list the documents. If I digitize a document, I add the computer file name and location as well.

Tip: I print out small white labels with the original document location to place on source copies using Avery Multi-Use Labels 5422.

What makes a document an Heirloom Original?

In my effort to KISS (Keep It Super Simple) I decided to consider only certain documents Heirloom Original and subject to archival preservation. Again, these criteria may not suit everyone, but I felt like I had to draw the line somewhere. Any document available only in the copy held in my hand, I deem an Heirloom Original. This includes my children’s special presentation baptism certificate, but not the official church copy. I figure that I can request that again from the church, and if I am worried about it, I can digitize the church copy and keep multiple copies of the files.

So, state and county-issued birth and death certificates, along with census photocopies, are filed in protective sleeves in my 3-ring binders. As are modern newspaper obituaries. The only things in archival storage are irreplaceable documents and artifacts.

One exception: Because my mom and I enjoy looking through Arline’s papers together, I also keep many documents from her collection in a 3-ring binder. Strictly speaking, I would like to keep everything from her collection in archival boxes, but then Mom and I lose the very wonderful connection of seeing Arline’s ink and paper. I use high-quality archival protective sleeves and 100% cotton rag paper for support if needed in these binders for the funeral programs, wedding notices, and cemetery locators that Arline collected. Oversize documents, like the marriage certificates, however are stored safely in an archival box.

This system may not work for you, but what’s most important is to find a method of organizing that suits your style, your time, and your own level of control. Elyse is doing a great job reviewing ideas for setting up a genealogy filing system at Elyse’s Genealogy Blog and coming up with some good questions to ask when getting organized.

I know that I need a system that will preserve my documents, be simple to set up and sustain, and give me some feeling of control. Works for me! What works for you?

 

Photos: Edwards-Kinsel marriage certificate, Arline Allen Kinsel Papers; Privately held by Denise Levenick [ADDRESS FOR PRIVATE USE,] Pasadena, California. 2010.

Saturday
May232009

Reviewing Archival Practices with Rebecca Fenning

Today's column at Shades of the Departed, "Raiders of the Lost Arc[hive]" by archivist Rebecca Fenning, is a wake-up call to all Family Curators. Who ever guessed at the untold, unprocessed treasures hidden in the depths of our favorite repositories? It is both frustrating and depressing to read that hundreds, if not thousands and tens of thousands, of documents are unavailable to researchers for lack of processing.

This rather sounds like my own "archive" of family papers. When I began organizing my grandmother's letters and miscellaneous papers, I felt the call to do things right. In so doing, I fell into the very archival abyss described by Mark A. Greene and Dennis Meissner in their report, "More Product, Less Paper." As Greene and Meissner describe it, archivists routinely process a collection by item-level handling, whether or not the collection warrants such minute attention. And, just like the good little archivist I longed to be, I foldered and refoldered every item and removed every piece of metal I encountered. And at the end of the summer, I too had only "processed" a fraction of the collection.

In fact, I should not be suprised. According to Greene and Meissner, an email survey of archivists estimated that it should require 14.8 hours per cubic foot to process 20th century material. I figure that I have a trunk-full of stuff, about 16 cubic feet; so it should take me about 236.8 hours or 29.6 days to organize it. That would be, of course, if I was experienced and knew what I was doing, which I am not.

And, if those figures aren't depressing enough... compare this to the time archivists actually spent processing similar materials -- "the modal average -- the most frequent value in the range -- was 33 hours per foot." It's no wonder I didn't make much headway.

While Rebecca's article for Shades is a heads-up for researchers to remember those hidden collections, I think she is also making a point which can help Family Curators work with their own material. We need to think about how we will use a collection, and preserve and process with that goal in mind. This might mean moving forward even if we don't have funds for expensive archival storage boxes, but it also means asking good questions if we donate our collection to a repository such as a library or museum so our treasures aren't forgotten in the back room of an archive.

Wednesday
Mar182009

9-1-1 for Family Historians

As a fan of Rebecca Fenning's blog, A Sense of Face, I am delighted to see she will be joining footnoteMaven at Shades of the Departed as part of Weekend With Shades, beginning this Saturday, March 21with her new column Saving Face.


Rebecca and I have corresponded a bit over various archival issues, and I look forward to reading her answers to the burning questions sure to be asked by Shades readers. Rebecca was a great help with some of my scanning questions for Arline's letters and photographs, so I know that she will be able to address a wide variety of archival situations.

Join The Family Curator at Shades this Saturday for Rebecca's debut column.